Bail is not a favour — it is a constitutional right in bailable matters and a statutory right where the law so provides. Even in non-bailable cases, the Supreme Court of India has consistently held that “bail, not jail” should be the default position for an accused who is not a flight risk, is unlikely to tamper with evidence, and poses no threat to the community. Understanding which type of bail applies to your situation — and how to pursue it effectively — is the first critical task when someone has been arrested or fears arrest.
Indian law recognises several distinct forms of bail, each governed by different provisions and available in different circumstances:
Where the offence is bailable, the arrested person is entitled to bail as a matter of right. The officer in charge of the police station, or the Magistrate before whom the person is brought, is bound to release the accused upon furnishing a bail bond with or without sureties. There is no discretion to deny bail in bailable offences.
For non-bailable offences — which carry more serious consequences — bail is at the court’s discretion. An application is made before the Magistrate (for offences within Magistrate’s jurisdiction) or the Sessions Court. The court considers: gravity of the charge, criminal history of the accused, likelihood of flight, risk of witness tampering, and public interest.
Applied for before arrest — when a person has reason to believe they may be arrested for a non-bailable offence. The Sessions Court or High Court can direct that the applicant be released on bail in the event of arrest. This is the most strategically valuable form of bail because it prevents custody entirely.
This is an indefeasible right that arises automatically if the police fail to file a chargesheet within the statutory period — 60 days (for offences punishable with death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for not less than 10 years) or 90 days (for other offences). Once this period expires without a chargesheet, the accused has an absolute right to bail that the court is bound to grant.
After conviction, the accused may apply for bail while their appeal is being heard. The High Court or Sessions Court may grant this on considering the merits of the appeal and the nature of the conviction.
At Indore, bail applications in first-instance criminal matters are heard by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (for offences within Magistrate’s cognisance) and by the Principal Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge for sessions-triable offences. Where bail is refused at Sessions Court level, an application can be moved before the MP High Court Indore Bench under Section 483 BNSS.
The High Court also entertains anticipatory bail applications directly — particularly where the case involves complexity, allegations of political motivation, or urgency that does not permit waiting for the Sessions Court. Both the Sessions Court and the High Court are within a few minutes of the firm’s office on MG Road, which is directly opposite the High Court building.
The Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI (2012) set out the principal considerations for bail in non-bailable matters:
In Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2021), the Supreme Court issued comprehensive guidelines on bail, stressing that courts should not mechanically deny bail and must apply the principle of “bail, not jail” as the norm. The Court directed that undertrial prisoners who have served a third of the maximum sentence should ordinarily be granted bail.
Advocate Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi has appeared in bail matters before the Indore Sessions Court and the MP High Court Indore Bench for over 19 years. His appointment as Special Public Prosecutor by the Government of Madhya Pradesh reflects the standard of credibility that courts and the state have placed in his handling of criminal proceedings. Raghuvanshi Vaidya & Partners handles bail applications — cause lists for which can be tracked on the Indore District Court daily board — in routine criminal cases as well as complex matters involving economic offences, anti-corruption cases, and special legislation — appearing before both the Sessions Court and the High Court depending on the stage and nature of the case.
Related Reading: Related Reading: How to Apply for Anticipatory Bail Before Arrest in Madhya Pradesh · How to Get Bail in a Criminal Case in India (Full Guide)
A bail application can be filed the same day as the arrest — there is no waiting period. In urgent matters, the Sessions Court or High Court can also be approached for urgent listing. For anticipatory bail, the application is filed before arrest and can be heard the same day if there is urgency.
Typically: a copy of the FIR, the arrest memo, identity proof of the accused (Aadhaar/passport), proof of address, details of proposed sureties (persons who will stand as guarantors), and any documents relevant to the case — such as records showing the accused has a fixed abode, employment, and community ties.
Yes. The prosecution or the court (suo motu) may apply for cancellation if the accused violates conditions, threatens witnesses, absconds, or commits another offence while on bail. The standard for cancellation is higher than for grant — there must be specific and compelling grounds.
Under Section 187(3) BNSS, if the police do not file a chargesheet within 60 days (for serious offences) or 90 days (for others), the accused acquires an indefeasible right to bail. This right exists regardless of the gravity of the offence and cannot be denied except on the ground of the accused not being ready to furnish surety. It is critical to track these deadlines from the date of arrest.
Both are equally valid bail orders. The Sessions Court is the first forum for non-bailable offences; the High Court is approached if the Sessions Court refuses, or if the case involves complexity or urgency warranting direct HC approach. The High Court has broader discretion and can grant bail with more liberal conditions where the Sessions Court may have imposed restrictive ones.
We are here to help you