Call us: +91 9406549595.
[email protected]
RVP AdvocatesRVP AdvocatesRVP AdvocatesRVP Advocates
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
  • Our Clients
  • Media
  • Articles
  • Legal Updates
  • Contact Us

Difference between permanent alimony and maintenance

Home Legal Articles Difference between permanent alimony and maintenance
NextPrevious

Difference between permanent alimony and maintenance

By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | Legal Articles | 0 comment | 6 June, 2023 | 1

In Indian family law, the terms “permanent alimony” and “maintenance” refer to different concepts regarding financial support for a spouse. However, it is important to note that the terminology and application of these concepts may vary depending on personal laws applicable to the individuals involved. While I can provide general information, please consult with a legal professional for specific advice in your situation.

Maintenance, as mentioned earlier, is the financial support provided by one spouse to the other during the marriage or after separation. The amount of maintenance is typically determined based on factors such as the financial condition of the spouse seeking maintenance, their earning capacity, the standard of living during the marriage, and other relevant circumstances.

Permanent alimony, on the other hand, refers to a lump sum or periodic payment granted to a spouse after divorce or judicial separation. It is intended to provide for the future financial needs of the spouse and can be awarded based on various factors such as the financial condition of both parties, their respective earning capacities, the duration of the marriage, and other relevant considerations.

Regarding Supreme Court judgments on alimony and maintenance, here are a few notable cases:

In the landmark case of Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate vs. Neela Vijaykumar Bhate (2003), the Supreme Court held that maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) should be awarded considering the financial capacity of the husband and the standard of living of the parties.

In the case of Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur (2017), the Supreme Court emphasized that the amount of permanent alimony should be fair and reasonable, taking into account the financial capacity of the husband, the income and lifestyle of both parties, and other relevant factors.

The Supreme Court, in the case of Manish Jain vs. Akanksha Jain (2020), ruled that in divorce cases, maintenance should be granted to the wife and children based on their needs and the husband’s financial capacity.

These judgments highlight the principles applied by the Supreme Court when determining maintenance and alimony. However, it’s important to consult with a legal professional to understand how these principles are applied in your specific case, as each situation may have unique circumstances that could influence the outcome.

In Indian family law, the provisions for claiming permanent alimony and maintenance for both spouse and children can vary depending on the personal laws applicable to the individuals involved. Here are some common provisions under different statutes:

  1. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Under Section 24, a spouse can claim temporary maintenance during the pendency of a divorce case. Under Section 25, permanent alimony can be claimed as part of the final divorce decree, taking into consideration factors such as the financial status of the parties, their respective needs, and other relevant circumstances. The court may also consider factors such as the duration of the marriage and the ability to pay.
  2. Muslim Personal Law: Under the Muslim personal law, a wife is entitled to maintenance called “Mehr” at the time of marriage. She can also claim maintenance during the period of “iddat” (waiting period after divorce). The amount and duration of maintenance can vary based on factors such as the husband’s financial capacity, the standard of living during the marriage, and the needs of the wife and children.
  3. Special Marriage Act, 1954: Similar to the provisions under the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 36 of the Special Marriage Act allows for temporary maintenance during the pendency of divorce proceedings. Section 37 enables the court to grant permanent alimony and maintenance to either spouse after considering factors such as the financial position of the parties, their needs, and other relevant circumstances.

These are general provisions, and there may be additional factors and considerations based on individual cases. It’s advisable to consult with a legal professional who specializes in family law to understand the specific provisions and procedures applicable to your situation. It is better to seek professional legal assistance of Advocate/lawyer in Indore for divorce/alimony/maintenance for handling your case in Family Court in Indore.

Article by: Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi & Nidhi Vaidya, Advocates-High Court of MP, Indore.

Indore, maintenance, permanent alimony
Avatar

Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi

More posts by Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi

Related Post

  • Divorce by Mutual Consent

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    Divorce is a difficult decision, but sometimes it becomes the best option for couples who find themselves unable to continue their marriage. In India, divorce by mutual consent is recognized under both the Hindu MarriageRead more

  • Quashing of False FIR

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    In India, a false FIR (First Information Report) or a criminal case can be quashed by the trial court or the High Court depending on stage of the case if it is determined that noRead more

  • Partition of Family Property

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    Partition of family property refers to the division or distribution of jointly owned property among the legal heirs. The division can occur either by mutual agreement or through a legal process, such as filing aRead more

  • Supreme Court Constitution Bench holds Jallikattu, Kambala and bull -cart racing legal

    Supreme Court Constitution Bench holds Jallikattu, Kambala and bull -cart racing legal

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    The Supreme Court said that this decision on the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act would also guide the Maharashtra and the Karnataka Amendment Acts. Thus, it held that all the three Amendment Acts are valid legislations.Read more

  • Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage: Decoding Supreme Court judgment on grant of divorce under Article 142 of Constitution; waiver of 6 month’s cooling off period

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    Given the expansive amplitude of power under Article 142(1) of the Constitution, the exercise of power must be legitimate, and clamours for caution, mindful of the danger that arises from adopting an individualistic approach asRead more

  • Explained| The momentous Same Sex Marriage matter before the Supreme Court Constitution Bench

    Explained| The momentous Same Sex Marriage matter before the Supreme Court Constitution Bench

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    Petitioner contended that they were entitled to the Fundamental Right to marry which was entrenched in the Constitution which includes the choice of a marital partner. Neither the State nor Society could intrude into theRead more

  • WhatsApp v Right to Privacy: New Data Protection Bill ready to be tabled in Monsoon Parliament Session, informs Centre; Supreme Court defers hearing

    WhatsApp v Right to Privacy: New Data Protection Bill ready to be tabled in Monsoon Parliament Session, informs Centre; Supreme Court defers hearing

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    The issue before the Supreme Court pertains to the question whether WhatsApp’s privacy policy which was introduced in January 2021 is in violation of right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.Read more

  • Supreme Court Constitution Bench considers the existence of Doctrine of Group of Companies in Indian jurisprudence vis-à-vis Arbitration Act

    Supreme Court Constitution Bench considers the existence of Doctrine of Group of Companies in Indian jurisprudence vis-à-vis Arbitration Act

    By Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi | 0 comment

    Group of Companies Doctrine- an Arbitration Agreement entered into by a Company within a group of Companies can bind its non-signatory affiliates, if the circumstances demonstrate that the mutual intention of parties was to bindRead more

Leave a Comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NextPrevious

Recent Posts

  • Empowering Justice: The Significance of Writs in Safeguarding Fundamental Rights in India
  • Supreme Court grants anticipatory bail to Police Constable in a Destruction of Property and Dacoity case.
  • Irretrievable breakdown of marriage | Supreme Court invokes Article 142 of the Constitution to grant mutual consent divorce.
  • Supreme Court grants interim relief to homebuyers for deferred payment of EMIs till possession of homes.
  • Rajasthan Civil Judge Recruitment| SC delivers Split verdict on considering candidature of OBC-EWS candidates despite belated submission of category certificates

Recent Comments

    GET IN TOUCH

    Get In Touch

    • 315, City Centre, Opp. MP High Court, MG Road, Indore- 452001 (MP)
    • +91 9406549595
    • +91 731 4049595
    • [email protected]

    Quick Links

    • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer

    Connect With Us

    Copyright 2023 | Raghuvanshi Vaidya & Partners | All Rights Reserved
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Areas of Practice
    • Our Clients
    • Media
    • Articles
    • Legal Updates
    • Contact Us
    RVP Advocates